Seiberg Witten 3: Dirac operators, Spin and Spinc connections

This is my third post on the set-up for the Seiberg-Witten invariants of 4-manifolds. The next post will finally define the Seiberg-Witten equations and invariants, so this is the last bit of background.

Symbols, generalized Laplacians, and Dirac operators

In order to define the Seiberg-Witten equations, we need to understand certain partial differential operators called Dirac operators. If you don’t know the formal definition of partial differential operators and their symbols, here is a link with some definitions and examples.

The class of all second order partial differential operator with the same symbol as the usual Laplacian: $\sigma_L(\xi)=-|\xi|^2I\in End(E,E)$ are called generalized Laplacians. Note that the symbol $\sigma_L(\xi): E_x\to E_x$ of a generalized Laplacian is an isomorphism on each fiber for $\xi\neq 0$ , which means generalized Laplacians are elliptic operators. An elliptic operator L is good because there are estimates on the norms of solutions to equations of the form $Lu=v$ . This allows us to use Fredholm theory to describe the space of solutions to equations using elliptic operators. (In particular the linearization of an elliptic operator is Fredholm, i.e. has finite dimensional kernel and cokernel).

Dirac operators are 1st order partial differential operators which square to a generalized Laplacian. Dirac operators inherit many of the nice properties of Laplacians, specifically they are also elliptic (though in a weaker sense than the Laplacian–my vague understanding is that the bounds we get from ellipticity of the Laplacian are uniform, whereas the bounds we get from ellipticity of a Dirac operator depend on the point in the manifold; in the case of compact manifolds these coincide).

Dirac Operators and Clifford multiplication

We mentioned above that the symbol of a generalized Laplacian, (which is the square of a Dirac operator) is $\sigma_L(\xi)=-|\xi|^2I$ , for $\xi\in \Gamma(T^*M)$ . Additionally, one can show that the symbol of a Dirac operator (which squares to a generalized Laplacian), is the square root of the symbol of the generalized Laplacian. Therefore $(\sigma_D(\xi))^2=-|\xi|^2I$ so $\sigma_D$ gives us a Clifford multiplication. In conclusion, a Dirac operator give rise to a Clifford structures by taking its symbol.

Conversely, given a Clifford structure, $c: \Gamma(T^*M)\to \Gamma(End(E))$ (equivalently $c: \Gamma(T^*M\otimes E)\to \Gamma(E)$ ) and a connection $\nabla: \Gamma(E)\to \Gamma(T^*M\otimes E)$ we can compose them

$D:\Gamma(E)\xrightarrow{\nabla}\Gamma(T^*M\otimes E)\xrightarrow{c}\Gamma(E)$

and the resulting operator is a Dirac operator.

Spin connections

A Riemannian manifold M has a distinguished connection, the Levi-Civita connection $\nabla^M$ , which has nice properties namely it preserves the metric g (this can be phrased either as $\nabla^Mg=0$ or $\nabla(g(X,Y))=g(\nabla X,Y)+g(X,\nabla(Y))$ ), and it is torsion free meaning $\nabla_XY-\nabla_YX-[X,Y]=0$ . Basically, this is a natural connection on TM when a Riemannian metric g is given.

Using the metric and orientation on M, the structure bundle of TM reduces to an $SO(n)$ -bundle. Namely, we can find gluing maps defining the tangent bundle that map into $SO(n)$ : $\{g_{\alpha\beta}: U_\alpha\cap U_\beta \to SO(n)\}$ which define a principal $SO(n)$ -bundle $P_{SO(n)}\to M$ . The Levi-Civita connection on TM induces a principal $SO(n)$ -connection on $P_{SO(n)}$ specified locally by

$\omega_{\alpha}\in \Omega^1(U_{\alpha})\otimes \mathfrak{so}(n).$

We have the double cover map $\tau: Spin(n)\to SO(n)$ , which induces, by differentiating at 1, an isomorphism $\tau_*: \mathfrak{spin}(n)\to \mathfrak{so}(n)$ .

If we have a Spin structure on M, this means there are lifts $\widetilde{g}_{\alpha\beta}: U_\alpha\cap U_\beta\to Spin(n)$ such that $\tau\circ \widetilde{g}_{\alpha\beta}=g_{\alpha\beta}$ . These define a principal Spin(n) bundle $P_{Spin(n)}$ . In this case, the Levi-Civita connection on $P_{SO(n)}$ induces a connection $\widetilde{\nabla}^M$ on $P_{Spin(n)}$ which is locally defined by

$\tau_*^{-1}\omega_{\alpha}\in \Omega^1(U_{\alpha})\otimes \mathfrak{spin}(n).$

So Riemannian manifolds with spin structures have a distinguished connection on the Spin(n) bundle.

The representations $\rho_\pm: Spin(4)\to Aut(\mathbb{S}^\pm)$ , and $\rho=(\rho_+,\rho_-)$ give rise to an associated bundle $S_0=P_{Spin}\times_\rho \mathbb{S}$ . The spin connection on M induces a connection $\nabla^{S_0}$ on $S_0$ whose local matrix valued 1-forms are defined by

$\rho_*\tau_*^{-1}\omega_{\alpha}\in \Omega^1(U_\alpha)\otimes End(\mathbb{S}).$

Recall that $T^*M$ acts on $S_0$ by the Clifford multiplication $c: Cl(TM)\otimes \mathbb{C}\to End(S_0)$ . The composition of the Clifford multiplication with the induced connection on $S_0$ yields a Dirac operators $D_0$ .

$\mathbf{Spin^c}$ connections

Remember, a $Spin^c(n)$ -bundle is specified by gluing data

$\{(h_{\alpha\beta}, z_{\alpha\beta}): U_{\alpha}\cap U_{\beta} \to Spin(n)\times U(1)\}$
satisfying the cocycle condition

$(h_{\alpha\beta}h_{\beta\gamma}h_{\gamma\alpha}, z_{\alpha\beta}z_{\beta\gamma}z_{\gamma\alpha})=\pm (1,1).$
We want to understand $Spin^c$ structures for M and their connections. Let $\sigma$ be a $Spin^c$ structure on M given by the $Spin^c(4)$ bundle $P_{Spin^c}$ .

Letting $\rho^c=(\rho^c_+,\rho^c_-)$ , the associated spinor bundle to $\sigma$ is $S_\sigma=P_{Spin(4)}\times_{\rho^c} \mathbb{S}$ , which splits into $S^\pm_\sigma = P_{Spin(4)}\times_{\rho^c_\pm}\mathbb{S}^{\pm}$ . A connection on the $Spin^c$ bundle will induce a connection on $S_\sigma, S^+_\sigma,S^-_\sigma$ . Also note that $S_\sigma$ has a Clifford structure, inherited from the map $c: Cl(V)\otimes \mathbb{C}\to End(\mathbb{S})$ .

In the case that M has a spin structure, $P_{Spin^c}=P_{Spin}\otimes (det\sigma)^{1/2}$ and $S_\sigma = S_0\otimes (det\sigma)^{1/2}$ .

In the general case, we will construct connections on the associated bundles using the Levi-Civita connection on M, and a choice of connection on the determinant line bundle of $\sigma$ .

In the case that TM is the trivial bundle, the determinant line bundle has a square root, and $P_{Spin^c}=P_{Spin}\otimes (det\sigma)$ and $S_\sigma=S_0\otimes (det\sigma)^{1/2}$ . We have the natural lift $\widetilde{\nabla}^M$ of the Levi-Civita connection to $P_{Spin}$ . This induces a natural connection $\nabla^{S_0}$ on the associated bundle $S_0$ , which we can tensor with any connection on the line bundle $(det\sigma)^{1/2}$ to get a connection on $S_{\sigma}=S_0\otimes (det\sigma)^{1/2}$ .

Remember that $S_0$ had a Clifford structure c as well as a natural connection $S_0$ which together give rise to a Dirac operator. We obtain a similar structure on $S_\sigma$ by twisting the triple $(S_0,\nabla^{S_0}, c)$ with a line bundle with connection $(L,\nabla^L)$ to obtain a triple $(S_0\otimes L, \nabla, c_L)$ where

$\nabla(s\otimes x) = \nabla^{S_0}s\otimes x +s\otimes \nabla^Lx$

and

$c_L: \Omega^*M \xrightarrow{c}End(S_0)\xrightarrow{\cdot \otimes I_L} End(S_0\otimes L)$

Therefore over trivial charts, a choice of connection A on $(det\sigma)^{1/2}$ gives rise to a Dirac triple $(S_\sigma,\nabla_A, c_\sigma)$ .

In general the determinant line bundle does not have a global square root, though over any trivial chart it does. When the determinant line bundle has a square root, the connections on $det(\sigma)$ are related to the connection on $(det(\sigma))^{1/2}$ as follows. If the connection on $det(\sigma)$ is defined by

$\{\omega_\alpha \in \Omega^1(U_\alpha)\otimes \mathfrak{u}(1)\}$

then the induced connection on $(det(\sigma))^{1/2}$ is defined by

$\{\frac{1}{2}\omega_\alpha \in \Omega^1(U_\alpha)\otimes \mathfrak{u}(1)\}.$

We can always choose a connection on $det(\sigma)$ . This induces a connection over each trivial chart on $(det(\sigma))^{1/2}$ . Then we can twist this in to the locally defined Dirac triples $(S_0,\nabla^{S_0},c)$ , to obtain $(S_\sigma, \nabla, c)$ on each trivial chart $U_\alpha$ . Finally, one can use a partition of unity to glue all these pieces back together to a global Dirac triple $(S_\sigma,\nabla, c)$ .

Seiberg Witten 3: Dirac operators, Spin and Spinc connections

One response to “Seiberg Witten 3: Dirac operators, Spin and Spinc connections”

Leave a comment Cancel reply

Recent Posts

Archives

Categories

Meta

Seiberg Witten 3: Dirac operators, Spin and Spinc connections

Share this:

Related

One response to “Seiberg Witten 3: Dirac operators, Spin and Spinc connections”

Leave a comment Cancel reply

Recent Posts

Archives

Categories

Meta